Freight/Signal
|
|
Good Tuesday, operators. Last week I promised you the one back-office workflow I'd automate first if I ran ten trucks, and the three I wouldn't touch. Researching it changed my answer — the “minutes per load” numbers everyone quotes turn out to have been measured by nobody. Below: the one figure that was measured, what it says to automate instead, the three jobs that stay human, and a build that runs under $25 a month. — Freight/Signal Editorial |
|
In today's issue
|
|
| The Cold Open |
|
ATRI published its 2026 operational costs report six days ago. Marginal cost per mile hit a record $2.336. Further in, a line that got almost no coverage: carriers cut non-driver staffing 7.8% last year. The back office already got cut. Nobody is debating whether to automate — the people are gone and the work isn't. Last week I promised the one back-office workflow I'd automate first if I ran ten trucks, and the three I wouldn't. Researching it changed my answer. |
| Three Signals | |||
| |||
| |||
|
| The Deep Dive |
The one I'd automate, and the three I wouldn't.First, the uncomfortable part. Ask what to automate first and you'll be told rate-confirmation entry (4–8 minutes a load) or check calls (3–5 per load). I went looking for where those numbers came from. They came from nowhere. Every one traces to a vendor blog running an openly hypothetical example — one framed "consider a 10-person brokerage processing 800 loads per month" — with the minutes attributed to no study at all. There is no independent time-motion research on any of it. The most-quoted figure in freight automation, "3–5 check calls per load," has no traceable origin. The one hours number that was measured points elsewhere. OOIDA surveyed its members (n=253, ±6%): 14.3 hours a week lost waiting at docks, and 17% collect nothing for it. Nobody sells software against detention, because it isn't an intelligence problem. It's a documentation problem. So: automate document capture. Point a cheap model at the rate con, the BOL and the POD once. That single extraction feeds your load entry, your invoice packet, and a timestamped record of when the truck arrived and left. On Haiku 4.5 that runs about half a cent a document. The machine's job is transcription, not judgment — so a wrong output is a correction, not a claim. And the three I wouldn't touch: the rate, the carrier pick, any compliance answer. One test separates them from the typing — correction, or claim? Rate errors get invoiced. Carrier errors get your freight stolen and, since a unanimous Supreme Court ruling in May, get your vetting file subpoenaed. Compliance errors get you cited, and 49 CFR 390.11 says the duty is yours. |
| Tool of the Week | ||
Type: Document capture · Effort: One evening · Risk: Low (drafts only, a human approves) A Gmail filter catches rate confirmations. Google Apps Script (free) sends each to Claude's cheapest model, Haiku 4.5. Structured fields come back as a pending row in a Sheet. Nothing reaches your TMS until someone clicks. For a 7-truck carrier at ~200 rate cons a month: under $25 all-in. The approval step is architecture, not policy — you can't skip it by getting busy, because nothing moves until a person moves it. No-code version: Parseur's free tier (20 pages/month) into Make.com's. Genuinely $0; the 20-page ceiling is the real limit. Worth saying plainly: not one freight-specific document tool publishes a price. Docparser, Parseur and Nanonets all do. Rossum, Klippa, HubTran — contact sales. If they won't quote you on a website, they weren't built for a ten-truck fleet. Keep human: everything downstream of the draft. Not a sponsored pick — no affiliate links, no vendor relationship. Prices fetched July 20; the half-a-cent-per-document figure is our arithmetic, and we're publishing the measured number next week. |
| Rule Watch | ||||||||||||||
Every FMCSA document since June 25 is a Notice — no new rules, no new proposals. Apart from tomorrow, the calendar is quiet. |
|
| Off the Dock |
|
The line held up better than I expected. Where the machine is copying something down, let it. Where it's deciding something — what to charge, who to trust, what the rule says — your name is on the authority, not its. Automate the typing. Never the deciding. Next Tuesday: Tools & Software — ten real rate confirmations through the cheap model, with the measured cost and the field-by-field error rate published. My half-a-cent figure is arithmetic. Let's see what it actually is. — Aman · [email protected] |
|